Category: CRE News (49)

Source: BisNow
By: Julie Littman
Date Posted: July 17, 2017

According to Bisnow, BioMed Realty will be constructing approximately 1.5 Million square feet of life science offices in South San Francisco.

With R&D office vacancy rates at historical lows on the Peninsula, developers are working hard to meet the demand–which often includes open office layouts, and “amenity-rich” campuses with fitness centers, on-site cafes, etc. As drug approvals move forward, the BioTech industry is projected to continue its “boom” with developers and Owners vying to take advantage of the sharp increases in rents.

Source: CoStar News
By: Mark Heschmeyer
Date Posted: June 14, 2017

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich has a warning for companies and industries that haven’t started to prepare for the next big tech disruptor — don’t wait.

“Companies should start thinking about their autonomous driving strategy now,” said Krzanich, who ranks the fast-developing technology on par with the rise of personal computing, the internet and smartphones for its potential impact on traditional business models.

“Less than a decade ago, no one was talking about the potential of a soon-to-emerge app or sharing economy because no one saw it coming. This is why we started the conversation around the passenger economy early, to wake people up to the opportunity streams that will emerge when cars become the most powerful mobile data generating devices we use, and people swap driving for riding.”

The new study which was sponsored by Intel and prepared by Strategy Analytics, explores the potential economic impact and industry shifts when today’s drivers become passengers and cars are controlled by an app.

“Autonomous driving and smart city technologies will enable the new passenger economy, gradually reconfiguring entire industries and inventing new ones thanks to the time and cognitive surplus it will unlock,” according to the study, which predicts the resulting productivity gains and related economic impacts will grow from $800 billion in 2035 to $7 trillion by 2050.

While the report does not directly address the impact on real estate, the scenarios from driverless technology it raises will clearly shake up the real estate landscape.

For one, what will people do with all the extra time? Self-driving vehicles are expected to free more than 250 million hours of commuting time per year in the most congested cities in the world.

Other highlights of future scenarios raised by a future of autonomous vehicles that could very much impact the CRE business include:

-Major impact on architecture, business design and urban planning as less space is devoted to accommodating parking facilities and roads in buildings and urban cores.
-Driverless delivery vehicles transporting goods between distribution centers and retail outlets could take much of the cost out of bridging the current ‘last mile’ challenge between retailers and consumers.
-Fast-casual dining or remote vending services could extend the reach of Starbucks or the local vegan restaurant beyond their brick and mortar locations.
-Mobile health care clinics and treatment pods, and even platooning pod hotels, vehicles could become transportation experience pods.

Auto Industry Shifting from Motown to Mountain View

While some of the future scenarios sound like science fiction, the driverless car is already here and many of the largest technology and mobility companies are already placing their bets, according to Intel.

Mercedes-Benz is already giving test rides in its app-powered F 015 Luxury in Motion research vehicle. Google has already logged about 1.3 million miles on its driverless cars in Mountain View, CA, where it is headquartered. General Motors is now testing its self-driving Bolt in Arizona. Audi, recently received a permit from California to test self-driving cars on public roads and BMW and Nissan have joined Mercedes-Benz in announcing plans to offer cars with self-driving capabilities by 2020.

This week, Apple CEO Tim Cook briefed Bloomberg on its big push into self-driving technology, which it aptly named Project Titan. Cook confirmed that Apple had initially been seeking to build its own car, but has now given that up as being overly complex and instead is focusing on developing the underlying technology and software used in future autonomous vehicles.

“There is a major disruption looming there,” Cook said.

The center of gravity in the car business may well have already shifted from Motown to Mountain View, says auto industry analyst Justin Toner.

“Taken to the extreme, I believe that autonomous cars will eradicate automobile accidents, eliminate traffic and significantly reduce the real estate dedicated to automobiles, freeing land for more productive use,” Toner says.

From a planning perspective, driverless cars are expected to increase the efficiency of roadways by traveling closer together and in narrower lanes, requiring significantly less road space than cars today. By some estimates, autonomous vehicles could support the same amount of traffic volume as error-prone, human-driven cars on one-quarter of the road space.

More Use, Less Parking

According to some estimates, cars are parked and not in use on average 95% of the time. The U.S. is estimated to have more than 800 million parking spaces, nearly four spaces for each vehicle.

If people move away from private car ownership to adopt the shared-use model, autonomous cars would likely be on the go more frequently, and require fewer parking spaces. And parking designated for autonomous cars could be located in a central area away from the core downtowns, allowing buildings to devote more space to accommodating people and less to accommodating cars.

Norman Foster, chairman and founder of the architecture firm Foster & Partners, told a crowd at a Wired Business Conference, last week that if he could design Apple’s recently constructed headquarters in Cupertino all over again, he would take into account “the changing patterns of transportation.”

Apple’s headquarters feature a massive underground garage built to hold 11,000 vehicles. Today, that’s an amenity, Foster said, but not too far in the future, it’s entirely possible that cars (and garages) will be far less important.

“Maybe the conventional garage needs to be re-thought and re-thought now,” Foster continued. “Maybe if I had a second time around I’d be putting a lot of persuasive pressure to say, ‘Make the floor-to-floor of a car park that much bigger, so if you’re not going to be filling it with cars in the future you could more easily retrofit it for more habitable space.”

Major Disruptions Also Can Be Costly

While much of the attention garnered by the autonomous driving technology is focused on the potential for good, including improved safety, greater efficiency and productivity gains, and any major disruption is also accompanied by costly and sometimes painful adjustments.

According to a recent article in Curbed, city and transportation planners are concerned over the prospect of people abandoning public transportation for the convenience of autonomous cars.

While it will take years for AV tech-driven cars to dominate the roadways, planners are concerned the convergence of autonomous vehicles, electrification and shared mobility has the potential to create a whole new wave of automation-induced sprawl without proper planning, regulations and incentives for people to keep riding buses and trains.

“Streets are 25 to 35 percent of a city’s land area… [the] most valuable asset in many ways,” Zabe Bent, a principal at transportation consulting firm Nelson\Nygaard and a speaker at the American Planning Association’s annual conference last month told the online housing site. “We need to really think about how we manage those spaces for the public good and for reducing congestion.”

Service Stations, Parking Facilities on Cutting Edge

Cleveland-based TravelCenters of America (Nasdaq: TA), the largest full-service travel center company in the U.S., also raised the issue of disruptive technologies in the energy or transportation industries to its investors.

“Various technologies are being developed in the energy and transportation industries that, if widely adopted, may materially harm our business,” the company reported. “For example, electric truck engines do not require diesel fuel and hybrid electric-diesel/gasoline engines may require substantially less diesel/gasoline fuel per mile driven. Further, driverless truck technologies may result in fewer individual truck drivers on the U.S. interstate highways and reduce the customer traffic and sales at our locations.”

And while driverless cars will still have to park somewhere, owners and operators of parking facilities are definitely on the cutting edge of this new technology.

Las Vegas-based MVP REIT, a nontraded REIT that primarily invests in parking facilities, recently added a new risk disclosure to its annual report, noting that changing lifestyles and technology innovations such as driverless vehicles may decrease the need for parking spaces, and could affect the value of its properties.

Big Picture Poses Net Gain for Real Estate

However, with the recent advent of Uber and other ride-sharing services, most owners and investors in commercial real estate see the emergence of autonomous cars as a net gain for real estate.

While zoning and transportation requirements will have to be addressed in order to realize the promise posed by AV and driverless cars, senior managers at several REITs are already bracing for the impact of the new technology.

“Driverless cars will eliminate the need for parking garages and de-urbanize our cities again,” Steven Grimes, CEO of Retail Properties of America (NYSE:RPAI) told investors last month. “Disruption is undeniably fixating. In some shape or form, all of us are discerning whether we are experiencing a normal course end of cycle disruption or the beginnings of a secular change in our space,” he added. “We think it’s both.”

“The handwriting is on the wall,” said Chris Volk, CEO of Store Capital Corp. (NYSE:STOR). “After all, we’re writing 15- to 20-year leases in a world where most pundits see the inception of driverless cars within five years.”

Link to article: Self Driving Cars & Real Estate

According to Bloomberg News, Blackstone Group has advised its investors to “dial back their expectations” regarding future return rates on real estate assets. Chris Heady, Asia Pacific Chairman, reasoned that expectations should be managed because the the return rates previously achieved over the last 5 years will become “harder to replicate.”

However.

According to Bisnow, other commercial real estate industry leaders aren’t shouting “bubble” just yet. “Reis economist Victor Calanog said in March the industry still has room to grow,” and that market deceleration is “not on a national level.” Even markets such as San Francisco where rents have consistently climbed quarter over quarter, Calanog predicts Landlords will have to offer more “concessions” but that concessions do not equate to “burst bubbles.”

California to Consider New Legislation on Dual Agency
Bills Supported by Brokerage Industry Rivals Could Clarify Disclosure Requirements in Dual Agency Transactions – Or Restrict Practice Outright

By: Randyl Drummer
April 6, 2016

A pair of bills addressing dual agency broker representation have been introduced in the California State Assembly. If taken up and passed, the proposed legislation has the potential to upend and reshape the way commercial real estate brokerages do business in California, and influence real estate practices in other states across the country.

As reported by CoStar on Friday, Assembly Bill 1059, introduced by Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, D-San Diego, would add a section to the California Civil Code prohibiting a brokerage firm, broker or any of the broker’s or brokerage’s licensees from acting as a dual agent in its representation of both the buyer and seller or any of their principals in the same commercial property transaction. The bill is scheduled for a hearing before the Assembly Judiciary Committee on May 2.

Jason Hughes, president and CEO of San Diego-based tenant representation firm Hughes Marino and a vocal critic of dual agency transactions, said he approached Gonzalez Fletcher’s office after the high court’s decision last fall about potential legislation to ban dual agency. Hughes said he recently formed a new nonprofit organization called the Association for Commercial Tenants (ACT) to advocate for the rights of businesses and tenants in commercial transactions.

“For the last 100-plus years, the commercial brokerage industry’s primary constituent has been landlords, but the real consumers are tenants,” Hughes tells CoStar. “Companies that lease or purchase office, industrial, manufacturing, retail, R&D, lab, and other space have always been on the short-end of the receiving stick in the commercial real estate industry. I fully support this bill and I know there are thousands of companies who lease and purchase commercial space who support it also.”
Industry Supported Bill Focuses On Disclosure

Another bill introduced last Friday in the California State Legislature, rather than ban dual agency outright, proposes to clarify and expand current disclosure requirements and has received early support from a lobbying group representing the broader CRE brokerage and business communities. AB 1626, introduced by Assemblywoman Jacqui Irwin, D-Thousand Oaks, would clarify the disclosure responsibilities of associate licensees and supervising brokers in dual agency transactions.

The Irwin bill, currently scheduled for Judiciary Committee hearing on April 25, would more clearly define when a dual agency condition exists and specify the fiduciary duties of licensees engaged in such transactions under existing state law.

Both bills are in response to a decision by the California State Supreme Court last November upholding a lower-court ruling that a listing broker had a fiduciary duty to both the buyer and the seller in a dual agency transaction. In the case, Hong Kong businessman Hiroshi Horiike sued Coldwell Banker and its agents in a dispute over the square footage of a Malibu home purchased by Horiike in 2007.

“We see Assemblywoman Irwin’s bill as the serious legislation that’s trying to address the concerns in the Horiike case,” said Matthew Hargrove, senior vice president of governmental affairs for the California Business Properties Association (CBPA), a legislative advocacy group representing CRE owners, tenants, developers, brokers, contractors, attorneys and other industry professionals.

“The real estate industry is already working with many advocates on the consumer side to look at the policy implications of what the Supreme Court said what needs to be fixed, in the statute and in practice, to make sure that the lessons handed down in the Horiike case are actually implemented,” Hargrove added.

The CBPA, which boasts a membership of 10,000, describes itself as the designated legislative and regulatory advocate for several major industry groups, including the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), Building Owners and Managers Association of California (BOMA California) and CCIM of Northern California.

While a commonplace practice for decades in both residential and commercial deals in the U.S. and around the world, several states in recent years have moved to regulate or ban dual agency real estate transactions in order to limit potential conflicts of interest and increase transparency in property sales. California, where dual agency deals are legal, adopted Senate Bill 1171 in January 2015, which requires disclosure to clients of dual agency relationships in commercial property transactions.

Hughes played a leading role in the passage of SB 1171 but said the Horiike decision demonstrates that dual agency in CRE deals needs to be banned rather than regulated. In supporting the Gonzalez Fletcher bill, Hughes noted a statement published last month by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), a global real estate accreditation body that certifies property and construction professionals, that advances more stringent conflict-of-interest requirements for its members, including an official ban on dual agency in the United Kingdom.

While a handful of states such as Colorado, Kansas, Florida and Wyoming in some form specifically prohibit dual agency, Hughes noted that about a dozen states closely follow California’s example on real estate regulation.

“Prohibition of dual agency would truly level the playing field for tenants, offering them legitimate transparency and conflict-free representation, something that should have happened decades ago,” Hughes said.
Lobbyist: Ban Would ‘Upend’ CRE Industry

However, the CBPA’s Hargrove argues that AB 1059 is too extreme a measure and would upend and disrupt the entire commercial real estate industry in California, while failing to address the core issue of fiduciary responsibility raised by the Supreme Court in the Horiike case.

“Under state law on the commercial side, you already have to disclose when there’s a dual agency situation in no uncertain terms,” Hargrove said. “We think those disclosures are right and appropriate, and we are concerned about how the political communications supporting AB 1059 are trying to undermine or claim that dual agency is nefarious. I absolutely disagree with that.”

“Under AB 1059, every single transaction would need to have two real estate agents,” Hargrove added. “It would disadvantage tenants by taking away the choice they now have to work with the real estate agency of their choice. Under current state law, you already have to disclose to tenants that you’re a dual agency, which allows the tenant to make their own decision.”

Hughes countered that AB 1626 is a “nothing burger bill” served up by advocates for the large brokerages and CRE groups that want to have it their way in maintaining the status quo.

“This is their way to proactively address the problem through misdirection and confusion with language that actually creates less accountability for brokers and adds more conflicts of interest, lack of transparency and consumer exposure than there is now,” Hughes said. “This is a legacy sponsored bill that continues to help the industry while hurting small business.”

While tenant representation firms would clearly benefit from a law prohibiting dual agency, the political influence and deep roots in the California market likely gives the advantage to legislation supported by the global full-service CRE brokerages and real estate lobbying groups, noted Katie R. Jones, real estate attorney with Walnut Creek, CA-based Miller Starr Regalia.

That being said, California agency law clearly requires more guidence from the Legislature in the wake of the Horiike decision, Jones said.

“The way the law is drafted now, based on current disclosure requirements, it’s an extreme challenge if not impossible for dual agents to adequately uphold their fiduciary responsibilities,” Jones said. “It makes more sense to find a solution that doesn’t upend the entire industry.”

Link to article: CoStar-Dual Agency Legislation

According to the New York Times, industrial real estate is experiencing a pot fueled “boom”. In the US states where steps have been taken to make marijuana legal, the demand for grow & pot processing warehouses and industrial spaces has increased with some “factories, warehouses, and self-storage units…being re-purposed for cultivation and processing of potent marijuana”.

While some in the real state industry view grow facilities as a gamble due to the fact that marijuana remains an illegal substance at the Federal level, for now Landlords across the nation are taking advantage of the premium rents being achieved for such facilities. Commercial real estate research firms are reporting prices for warehouse spaces increasing “by more than 50% from 2010 and 2015” in the Denver market where recreational pot was legalized in 2012. But, Denver is not the only commercial market experiencing a boom in industrial real estate activity. According to the New York Times, industrial areas “from Monterey, CA to Portland, ME” have undergone a transformation spurred by the pot industry and, “once-blighted neighborhoods and sending property values soaring.”

Furthermore, according to BISNOW, “legal pot sales hit $6.7B in 2016 and are expected to rise above $20B by 2021.” With increased sales of legal pot, the demand for industrial space will continue to grow, potentially creating a “new sector in the industrial real estate market.” But, with the new Federal Administration in place, some in the industry are concerned that the weed bubble will pop due to stricter regulation of pot sales and pot cultivation.

According to the Registry, two buildings located at 657 & 667 Mission Street in San Francisco’s South Financial District have sold for approximately $100MM to Align Real Estate and Vanke Holdings USA. “657 and 667 Mission Street total 130,000 square feet…are currently 65% occupied with short term leases allowing the new owners the flexibility to re-position the buildings as Class A creative office space with premier ground floor retail”, as reported by the article.

Registry has based the pricing of the assets on a press release from Square Mile Capital Management wherein the loan brokerage firm stated they originated a $70 Million loan for 657 & 667 Mission Street. According to the article, the loan “represented a 70 percent loan-to-value” which equates to approximately “$770 per square foot, or roughly $100 Million.”

Source: CoStar News
By: Mark Heschmeyer
Date Posted: February 10, 2017

BGC Partners Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP) will be the first to test the IPO market this year for a major commercial real estate firm after it submitted a confidential draft registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to spin off Newmark Grubb Knight Frank (NGKF) as a separate public company.

Under the plan for a proposed initial public offering, BGC would offer Class A common stock in a newly formed subsidiary that will hold BGC’s real estate services business.

The number of Class A shares to be offered and the price range for the proposed offering have not yet been determined.

In the filing, BGC said it may choose to distribute the shares that BGC will hold of the newly formed subsidiary to BGC’s stockholders in a tax-free spin-off after a certain period following the expected offering. Very little else about the proposed public offering was disclosed in its announcement.

NGKF is a full-service commercial real estate platform that comprises BGC’s real estate services segment and includes such other operations, including Newmark Cornish & Carey, ARA, Landauer Valuation & Advisory, and Excess Space Retail Services Inc. Together with its affiliates and London-based partner Knight Frank, NGKF has more than 12,800 employees across more than 370 offices and manages 250 million square feet.

In its most recent quarterly report, BGC partners reported that real estate services segment generated approximately 44% of its revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Real Estate brokerage revenues were $233.7 million, up 4% year-over-year, which included growth in real estate capital markets of 17%, partially offset by decreased leasing and other services revenue of 3%.

In that filing, BGC said it believes that BGC’s assets and businesses are worth considerably more than what is reflected in its current share price.

“As we have previously stated, we are actively working on ways to unlock substantial value for our investors,” the company said then.

BGC has been growing its real estate business with notable new hires, including atop investment sales team in New England in late 2015 and landing a top-producing Los Angeles office investment sales team, eight star brokers in Southern California and a pair of elite Chicago tenant rep brokers early last year.

In making the announcement, BGC seems to have beaten rival Cushman & Wakefield to the punch in going public. Cushman & Wakefield has been rumored to be eyeing an IPO this year as well.

Link to article: Real Estate Services IPO

On Tuesday, February 14, 2017, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen testifed before the Senate regarding current economic trends, bank lending, and possible changes to Dodd-Frank. According to Bisnow, Yellen stated that due to “solid job growth, rising inflation, and healthy wages” that she may “recommend another rate hike” but did not provide specific timing of an increase. The Fed will be exploring the rate hike discussion at its upcoming meeting in March at which a clear timeline may emerge, however, as the article notes Yellen clarified that any future rate hikes would be steered by “economic trends alone” and not on “speculation on fiscal stimulus”.

In regards to bank lending, Yellen indicated that “commercial and industrial loans have surpassed” the number of loans made during the “2008 peak”. Although U.S. institutional lending had decreased, according to the article, capital for commercial projects has been buoyed by “foreign investment and rising interest from institutional investors.” Further, “commercial and industrial loans have been on the rise…increasing by an average rate of 10.6% a month over the last five years.”

Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen indicated in November that a raise to the U.S. interest rate could be happening “relatively soon.” The “soon” came just a month later with the announcement by the Federal Reserve yesterday that the rate will increase by an initial 0.25%. However, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, the rate could increase by as much as 0.75% over “three quarter-point moves” in 2017.

Financial analysts are suggesting that the move to increase the rate is a signal by the Fed of its optimism about the strength of the economy and “pointed to a strengthening labor market nearing full employment and inflation moving more rapidly towards targeted levels,” according to the article. This latest increase by the Fed is only one of two in the last decade.

But what the increase to the interest mean for commercial real estate? According to Bisnow, rate hikes usually lead the way to “higher borrowing costs…impacting profitability and future acquisitions.” However, as the article points out, this particular increase was long in the making and investors, REITS and property owners have anticipated this increase and have planned/priced accordingly. Therefore, the impact of the first .25% jump “may not have as great an impact” on commercial real estate activities as the effect that “comes from long-term rates.”